[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":825},["ShallowReactive",2],{"home":3,"article-\u002Fblog\u002Farchitecture-audit-eight-dimensions":318},{"id":4,"title":5,"articleCta":6,"capabilities":11,"capabilitiesSectionText":52,"capabilitiesSectionTitle":53,"closing":54,"contact":59,"engagements":71,"engagementsSectionText":103,"engagementsSectionTitle":104,"extension":105,"faq":106,"footer":144,"founder":149,"getStartedSectionTitle":164,"getStartedSteps":165,"heroCtaButton":178,"heroKicker":179,"heroPoints":180,"introSectionText":184,"introSectionTitle":185,"meta":186,"microcopy":187,"navbar":203,"processSectionText":226,"processSectionTitle":227,"processSteps":228,"qualifier":245,"services":264,"servicesSectionText":285,"servicesSectionTitle":286,"stem":287,"trustBar":288,"whyUs":295,"whyUsSectionTitle":316,"__hash__":317},"home\u002Fhome.yaml","AI Automation, Agents & Software Architecture Consultancy",{"kicker":7,"title":8,"primary":9,"secondary":10},"Working on something like this?","A 30-minute call tells us both whether we can help.","Book a discovery call","More field notes",[12,16,20,24,28,32,36,40,44,48],{"title":13,"icon":14,"description":15},"Custom Software, Built Around Your Workflow","code","One-size-fits-all fits nobody in particular. We design and ship software that matches the way your team operates, not the way a generic product wants you to.",{"title":17,"icon":18,"description":19},"AI Automation & Agentic Workflows","workflow","n8n orchestrations, LangGraph agents, and RAG pipelines that quietly handle the repetitive work in the background. Fewer tickets, fewer copy-paste jobs, more throughput.",{"title":21,"icon":22,"description":23},"MCP Integrations for AI-Ready Tools","plug","We build Model Context Protocol servers that expose your internal systems to Claude, ChatGPT, and Copilot, so your team can use AI safely against the data that matters.",{"title":25,"icon":26,"description":27},"ERP, CRM & Data Integrations","database","We wire up the systems that should have been talking years ago. Clean data flows between ERP, CRM, and operational tools, plus dashboards that turn it into decisions.",{"title":29,"icon":30,"description":31},"Full-Stack Engineering","layers","Frontend, backend, databases, APIs: we cover the whole build in Vue, React, Node, Python, PostgreSQL, Redis and MongoDB. One team owning the stack top-to-bottom means fewer seams for bugs to hide in.",{"title":33,"icon":34,"description":35},"Cloud, Platform Engineering & DevOps","cloud","AWS, Azure, GCP. Kubernetes, Terraform, CI\u002FCD pipelines, infrastructure as code. We build the platform your app runs on so deploys are boring, environments are reproducible, and on-call isn't a horror story.",{"title":37,"icon":38,"description":39},"Security, SecOps & Compliance","shield","Security built in from day one, not bolted on before the audit. Threat modelling, least-privilege access, secret management, dependency hygiene, and the paper trail to prove it. Comfortable working under HIPAA, SOC 2, and enterprise security review.",{"title":41,"icon":42,"description":43},"Architecture & System Design","network","Monolith, microservices, event-driven or serverless: we pick the shape that matches your scale, your team, and your budget, not the one that looks impressive in a talk. Clear boundaries, clean contracts, documentation a human can read.",{"title":45,"icon":46,"description":47},"Industry Experience That Transfers","building","Healthcare (HIPAA, HL7, FHIR), insurance, fintech, logistics, SaaS. Different industries share the same underlying problems, and the patterns that solve them carry over.",{"title":49,"icon":50,"description":51},"The Idea You Haven't Built Yet","lightbulb","Got a weird integration, a backlog of 'we should automate this', or a product idea that no vendor covers? Tell us about it. The interesting work tends to start with a messy whiteboard.","When the SaaS subscriptions stop adding up and the spreadsheets start creaking, it's time for something built around how your business works. Here's where we come in.","When Off-the-Shelf Software Stops Fitting",{"kicker":55,"title":56,"accent":57,"tagline":58},"Next step","Bring the problem.","We'll bring the architecture.","Software architecture and AI automation consultancy, led by a senior architect.",{"title":60,"description":61,"form":62},"Let's Talk About the Work You'd Rather Not Do Manually.","Tell us what's slow, brittle, or eating your team's week. We'll tell you whether automation, an AI agent, or a proper architecture rethink is the right call, and what it would take.",{"title":63,"description":64,"namePlaceholder":65,"emailPlaceholder":66,"messagePlaceholder":67,"submitButton":68,"errorMessage":69,"thankYouMessage":70},"Get in Touch","Tell us about your project or pain points.","Your Name","Your Email","How can we help?","Let's Talk","Oops! Something went wrong. Please try again later, or email us at","Thank you! We'll be in touch shortly.",[72,78,83,88,93,98],{"title":73,"featured":74,"bestFor":75,"description":76,"price":77},"Discovery Sprint",true,"Best for: teams with a fuzzy problem and a real deadline.","A focused one-to-two week engagement to turn a vague brief into a concrete plan. You walk away with an architecture recommendation, a costed roadmap, and a clear go\u002Fno-go.","Fixed fee · scoped up front",{"title":79,"bestFor":80,"description":81,"price":82},"Architecture Review","Best for: existing systems, vendor proposals, or pre-build sanity checks.","We review your codebase, infrastructure, or an incoming quote and give you a plain-English report: what's solid, what's risky, what to fix first, and what it'll cost.","Fixed fee · 1–2 weeks",{"title":84,"bestFor":85,"description":86,"price":87},"System & Architecture Audit","Best for: due diligence, pre-acquisition, or deep technical forensics across a product suite.","A multi-week, independent deep-dive across architecture, codebase, CI\u002FCD, security posture, and cloud-readiness. Delivered as a structured written report for executive stakeholders: technical risks, modernization gaps, and prioritized recommendations, backed by evidence.","Fixed fee · 3–12 weeks",{"title":89,"bestFor":90,"description":91,"price":92},"Fractional Architect Retainer","Best for: founders and SMEs without a full-time technical lead.","Ongoing senior technical leadership on a monthly retainer. You get a CTO-level adviser on call for hiring, architecture, vendor calls, and the decisions that are expensive to get wrong.","Monthly retainer · flexible scope",{"title":94,"bestFor":95,"description":96,"price":97},"Fixed-Scope Build","Best for: automations, integrations, and well-defined features.","You know what you need. We scope it, quote it, and ship it in four to twelve weeks, with working software demoed every fortnight.","Fixed quote after discovery",{"title":99,"bestFor":100,"description":101,"price":102},"Ongoing Delivery Partner","Best for: longer builds and teams that want a steady senior partner.","A small, senior pod working alongside your team on a rolling basis. Great for modernization, platform work, and anything that needs architectural consistency over months, not weeks.","Monthly · capped effort","Pick the engagement shape that fits the problem. We'll tell you which one you probably need.","Ways to Work With Us","yaml",{"title":107,"subtitle":108,"cta":109,"questions":110},"Frequently Asked Questions","The questions we hear most often on discovery calls.","Still have questions? Email us at",[111,114,117,120,123,126,129,132,135,138,141],{"question":112,"answer":113},"What does Innovi Pro do?","We're a small software consultancy. Two things we do well: help you make the big technical decisions (architecture, stack, vendors, scaling), and build the software and automations that come out of those decisions. Think senior engineering partner rather than body-shop agency.",{"question":115,"answer":116},"Who do you work with?","Founders and SMEs who've outgrown spreadsheets and SaaS duct tape, scale-ups that need a senior hand on the architecture, and established companies that want to modernize operations without a year-long transformation project. Industry-wise we've shipped work in healthcare, insurance, fintech, logistics, and SaaS.",{"question":118,"answer":119},"How is this different from hiring an agency or a dev shop?","You talk to the people doing the work. No layered account managers, no pitch-deck team handing you off to juniors. Engagements are led by a senior software architect, delivered by a small trusted network, and sized to the outcome — not to fill a bench.",{"question":121,"answer":122},"Do you only do AI work?","No. AI and automation are a big part of what we do because that's where most of the quick wins are right now, but the core of the business is solid software architecture and custom development. Sometimes the best answer is a better database schema, not an AI agent.",{"question":124,"answer":125},"How do engagements typically start?","With a short discovery call: no deck, no hard sell. We want to understand what is slow, brittle, or blocked. From there you get one of three things: a fixed-scope project proposal, a retainer for ongoing architectural guidance, or an honest 'you don't need us for this' and a pointer in the right direction.",{"question":127,"answer":128},"How much does a project cost?","It depends on scope and on how involved you want us to be. Discovery sprints, reviews and audits are fixed-fee and scoped up front. Builds get a fixed quote once discovery has defined them. Advisory and delivery partnerships run on a monthly retainer. Every proposal lists the deliverables, what is out of scope and how each deliverable will be accepted. We'd rather quote accurately than quote fast.",{"question":130,"answer":131},"How quickly can you start?","Discovery calls usually happen within the week. For smaller automation or advisory work we can often start within two weeks. Larger builds are planned around your timeline and ours. We deliberately keep the active client list small so the people you meet are the ones actually doing the work.",{"question":133,"answer":134},"Will you work with our existing team and tools?","Almost always, yes. Most of our work augments an in-house team rather than replacing it. We adapt to your stack, your processes, and your codebase; we're not here to rewrite everything in our favorite framework.",{"question":136,"answer":137},"What about security, compliance, and data protection?","Taken seriously by default. We've worked under HIPAA in healthcare and inside the security expectations of large regulated enterprises. NDAs are standard, data stays where it should, and we're comfortable operating in environments where audit trails and access control aren't optional.",{"question":139,"answer":140},"Do you have a preferred automation platform?","We use n8n heavily because it provides the right balance of power and transparency for most business automation. That said, we're not religious about tools. If a project is better served by a custom workflow engine, a LangGraph agent, or even plain code, that's what we'll recommend.",{"question":142,"answer":143},"We're not sure what we need yet. Is it too early to talk?","That's the best time to talk. A 30-minute call before you commit to a direction tends to save months of rebuilding later. Bring the problem, not a spec, and we'll help you figure out the shape of the solution.",{"title":145,"address":146,"email":147,"copyright":148},"Innovi Pro","Cluj-Napoca, Romania","contact@innovi.pro","© 2025 Innovi Pro. All rights reserved.",{"kicker":150,"name":151,"role":152,"photoAlt":153,"bio":154,"tags":157},"The architect behind Innovi Pro","Mihai Farcas","Lead Software Architect","Mihai Farcas, Lead Software Architect at Innovi Pro",[155,156],"I help teams across industries design and deliver custom software that is secure, scalable, and built around real operational needs. My work combines **architecture consulting** with hands-on delivery through a trusted network of engineers, so you can ship without hiring a full team first.","I write about the engineering behind this work on [mihai.ltd](https:\u002F\u002Fmihai.ltd\u002Fblog) and on the [Innovi Pro blog](\u002Fblog).",[158,159,160,161,162,163],"Software architecture","Agentic AI","n8n","MCP","Kubernetes","Healthcare IT","Get Started In 4 Easy Steps",[166,169,172,175],{"title":167,"description":168},"Reach Out","Email us or fill out the contact form describing your project requirements.",{"title":170,"description":171},"Discovery Call","We'll schedule a discovery call to discuss your vision and goals.",{"title":173,"description":174},"Get a Quote","Get a tailored proposal outlining the recommended solutions, timeline, and cost.",{"title":176,"description":177},"We Start Building","Once you're ready, we kick off the development process and keep you updated every step of the way.","See How We Can Help","Software architecture · AI automation · Cluj-Napoca",[181,182,183],"Led by a senior software architect","Production n8n & agentic AI systems","HIPAA, HL7 and FHIR experience","We build the AI agents, n8n workflows, and MCP integrations that take the repetitive, unglamorous work off your team, so people spend their time on the parts of the job that need a human.","AI Automation Built Around [Your Business.]",{},{"primaryCta":9,"stackTitle":188,"scorecardLink":189,"partnerBadge":190,"qualifierCta":193,"ideaCta":194,"featuredEngagement":195,"engagementsHelp":196,"engagementsHelpLink":197,"whyUsCard":198,"formNote":202},"The stack we ship on","The method",{"kicker":191,"label":192},"Production stack","n8n automation","Sounds like us? Let's talk","Tell us about it","Typical first step","Not sure which one fits?","Book a call and we'll tell you.",{"kicker":199,"title":200,"cta":201},"Start here","A 30-minute call. No deck, no hard sell.","Book it","NDAs are standard. Your message goes straight to the architect.",{"items":204},[205,208,211,214,217,220,223],{"title":206,"url":207},"Services","\u002F#services",{"title":209,"url":210},"Capabilities","\u002F#capabilities",{"title":212,"url":213},"Process","\u002F#process",{"title":215,"url":216},"Engagements","\u002F#engagements",{"title":218,"url":219},"Why Us","\u002F#why-us",{"title":221,"url":222},"Blog","\u002Fblog",{"title":224,"url":225},"Book a Call","\u002F#contact","No mystery, no 40-page Statements of Work. Here is what working with us looks like.","How We Work",[229,233,237,241],{"title":230,"meta":231,"description":232},"1. Discovery Call","30 min · free","A 30-minute conversation. You describe what's slow, broken, or blocking. We ask the awkward questions. No deck, no pitch, no obligation. If we're not the right fit, we'll say so and point you at someone who is, when we know one.",{"title":234,"meta":235,"description":236},"2. Architecture & Scoping","1–2 weeks · fixed fee","A short, paid deep-dive of one to two weeks. You get a written architecture recommendation, a risk list, and a costed roadmap. This alone is often the most valuable thing clients buy from us.",{"title":238,"meta":239,"description":240},"3. Build, Automate, Integrate","2-week cycles","Delivered in short, visible iterations: two-week cycles with working software at the end of each. We work in the open: shared backlog, shared repo, direct access to the engineers.",{"title":242,"meta":243,"description":244},"4. Handover & Keep-The-Lights-On","Optional retainer","You get clean code, documentation a human can read, and a team that's trained to own it. We stick around on a light retainer if you want ongoing architectural guidance, or step fully out. Your call.",{"title":246,"subtitle":247,"items":248},"Is this you?","Most of our best engagements start with one of these.",[249,252,255,258,261],{"title":250,"description":251},"Your SaaS stack has quietly become a spreadsheet with extra steps.","Ten tools, three of them half-used, and the real process still lives in someone's inbox. You need software that fits the way your team works.",{"title":253,"description":254},"You inherited a codebase and you're not sure if it's salvageable.","Maybe a previous agency, maybe a co-founder who left. You need a clear-eyed second opinion before you put another cent into it.",{"title":256,"description":257},"Your team spends half its week on work a computer should be doing.","Invoicing, triage, copy-pasting between systems, answering the same five questions. You're ready to automate but want it done properly, not with a fragile chain of scripts.",{"title":259,"description":260},"You're about to commit to a 6-figure build and want a second pair of eyes.","An independent architecture review before you sign. Vendor quotes decoded into plain English. A roadmap you can follow.",{"title":262,"description":263},"You know AI should be helping, but you don't know where to start.","Not another chatbot demo: automations and agents plugged into the systems you already run, with straight advice about what is worth doing and what is hype.",[265,275],{"title":266,"description":267,"icon":268,"deliverables":269},"Software Architecture & Technical Consultancy","A senior architect in your corner, without the full-time headcount. Independent system and architecture audits, technical due diligence, vendor code reviews, cloud and container readiness assessments, and costed modernization roadmaps. We produce written, data-driven reports executives can act on and engineers actually respect. Especially useful before acquisitions, major rebuilds, or any six-figure technical decision.","architect",[270,271,272,273,274],"Architecture and system audits","Technical due diligence","Vendor code reviews","Cloud and container readiness","Costed modernization roadmaps",{"title":276,"description":277,"icon":278,"deliverables":279},"AI Automation, Agents & n8n Workflows","Production-grade automation, not demo-ware. We design n8n workflows, build custom agentic AI with LangGraph, and ship MCP servers that plug your internal tools straight into Claude, ChatGPT, and Copilot. Autonomous agents for support, invoicing, and back-office ops. Clean integrations between ERP, CRM, and AI that keep working on a Monday morning.","automation",[280,281,282,283,284],"n8n workflows","LangGraph agents","MCP servers for Claude, ChatGPT and Copilot","Support, invoicing and back-office agents","ERP and CRM integrations","Two ways to work with us: strategic consultancy when the decisions are expensive, and hands-on delivery when it's time to build. Often both.","What We Do","home",{"title":289,"items":290},"Senior experience you can reach directly.",[291,292,293,294],"10+ years shipping enterprise software","Experience across healthcare, insurance, fintech & SaaS","Published on DEV, YouTube & industry blogs","HIPAA · HL7 · FHIR experience",[296,300,304,308,312],{"title":297,"icon":298,"description":299},"A Team Led by an Architect","compass","Every engagement is led end-to-end by a senior software architect: the same person on the discovery call, in the design doc, and on the pull requests. No handoff to a junior delivery team, no layer of account managers translating between you and the build.",{"title":301,"icon":302,"description":303},"Deep n8n Expertise, Serious About AI","badge","Extensive production experience in n8n, LangGraph, MCP, and the wider agentic AI stack. We pick the right tool for the job instead of forcing every problem into the same framework.",{"title":305,"icon":306,"description":307},"Enterprise Experience, Startup Pace","gauge","Patterns learned on large-scale enterprise systems, applied at the speed a smaller team needs. Secure, scalable, and not over-engineered.",{"title":309,"icon":310,"description":311},"Small Team, Direct Access","users","You talk to the people doing the work. Decisions happen in hours, not change-request cycles. Lean on purpose, so your budget goes into outcomes instead of overhead.",{"title":313,"icon":314,"description":315},"AI-Accelerated Delivery","sparkles","We use AI to move faster where it helps (code scaffolding, research, testing) and keep humans in charge of the parts that matter. You get more software, sooner, without the usual quality trade-off.","Why Teams Work With Us","6q6dgWrLG8hN7zDaK4pfIxGN1megf6_hGCU5JE2fAnQ",{"id":319,"title":320,"author":145,"body":321,"canonical":805,"date":806,"description":807,"extension":808,"image":344,"imageAlt":809,"imageFallback":810,"meta":811,"navigation":74,"ogImage":810,"path":812,"published":74,"readingTime":813,"seo":814,"stem":815,"tags":816,"twitterCard":822,"type":823,"__hash__":824},"blog\u002Fblog\u002Farchitecture-audit-eight-dimensions.md","The 8-Dimension Architecture Audit: Find Your Weakest Link",{"type":322,"value":323,"toc":783},"minimark",[324,328,332,335,338,346,351,354,357,360,413,416,420,423,462,465,469,472,477,494,500,504,518,523,527,541,546,550,564,569,573,576,590,595,599,613,618,622,636,641,645,659,664,668,675,678,681,685,688,691,697,701,704,740,743,747,750,764,767,771,774,777,780],[325,326,320],"h1",{"id":327},"the-8-dimension-architecture-audit-find-your-weakest-link",[329,330,331],"p",{},"Every engineering leader knows their architecture has problems. Almost none can tell you, in rank order, which problem to fix first. That is the gap this post closes.",[329,333,334],{},"An architecture audit does not have to be a three-month McKinsey engagement. Ours takes a team two hours with the right template and returns a scorecard that survives contact with reality. Eight dimensions, scored 0-5, with a target score, a gap, and a prescribed next move for each one. Your lowest score is the weakest link. Until you fix it, every other score is a guess.",[329,336,337],{},"This article is the scorecard we use. Steal it.",[329,339,340],{},[341,342],"img",{"alt":343,"src":344,"title":345},"Eight-dimension architecture audit: radar chart of current scores on the left, scorecard panel with targets and next moves on the right, highlighting observability as the weakest dimension.","\u002Fblog\u002Fdiagrams\u002Farchitecture-audit-dimensions.webp","Eight dimensions, one scorecard. Find your weakest link before production does.",[347,348,350],"h2",{"id":349},"why-eight-dimensions","Why eight dimensions",[329,352,353],{},"You can audit architecture with two dimensions or twenty. Both are wrong. Two misses too much. Twenty creates so much debate that nothing gets prioritized.",[329,355,356],{},"Eight is the sweet spot because it covers every failure mode we have actually seen in production without leaving room for ceremony. If your architecture is strong on all eight, your platform is probably fine. If it is weak on one, you know exactly where to put the next quarter of engineering time.",[329,358,359],{},"The eight:",[361,362,363,371,377,383,389,395,401,407],"ol",{},[364,365,366,370],"li",{},[367,368,369],"strong",{},"Security & Compliance:"," controls, threat model, auth, regulatory posture.",[364,372,373,376],{},[367,374,375],{},"Scalability:"," how the system behaves under 10x load.",[364,378,379,382],{},[367,380,381],{},"Maintainability:"," how fast a new engineer can ship a change safely.",[364,384,385,388],{},[367,386,387],{},"Delivery Velocity:"," time from \"we should do X\" to X being in prod.",[364,390,391,394],{},[367,392,393],{},"Observability:"," can you see what the system is doing in real time?",[364,396,397,400],{},[367,398,399],{},"Cost Efficiency:"," cost per unit of user value, and the trajectory of that ratio.",[364,402,403,406],{},[367,404,405],{},"Tech Debt:"," known shortcuts you are paying interest on.",[364,408,409,412],{},[367,410,411],{},"Team Fit:"," does the stack match the team's skills and the hiring market?",[329,414,415],{},"Not on the list: \"code quality\" (it's inside maintainability), \"resilience\" (split between scalability and observability), \"documentation\" (symptom of maintainability). Keep the list at eight and the conversation stays useful.",[347,417,419],{"id":418},"the-scoring-rubric","The scoring rubric",[329,421,422],{},"Each dimension scores 0 to 5 against a fixed rubric. You do not need to agree with our rubric. You need to pick one and use it consistently.",[424,425,426,432,438,444,450,456],"ul",{},[364,427,428,431],{},[367,429,430],{},"0: Broken."," Actively hurting the business right now.",[364,433,434,437],{},[367,435,436],{},"1: Neglected."," No active work. Likely to break under any new pressure.",[364,439,440,443],{},[367,441,442],{},"2: Functional."," Works in the happy path. Fails under stress.",[364,445,446,449],{},[367,447,448],{},"3: Competent."," Works most of the time, with known gaps.",[364,451,452,455],{},[367,453,454],{},"4: Strong."," Handles current and near-future load. Monitored.",[364,457,458,461],{},[367,459,460],{},"5: Best-in-class."," A competitive advantage.",[329,463,464],{},"Most architectures end up scoring 1-3 on most dimensions, with one or two at 4+. That is normal. A system scoring 5s across the board is either brand new or being described by marketing.",[347,466,468],{"id":467},"walking-each-dimension","Walking each dimension",[329,470,471],{},"Here is what to look at per dimension, in the order we assess them. Treat these as the minimum probe; add your own organization-specific checks.",[473,474,476],"h3",{"id":475},"_1-security-compliance","1. Security & Compliance",[424,478,479,482,485,488,491],{},[364,480,481],{},"Is there a written threat model? When was it last updated?",[364,483,484],{},"Is auth centralized (SSO, RBAC) or ad-hoc?",[364,486,487],{},"Are secrets rotated, or pasted into env files?",[364,489,490],{},"For regulated domains (HIPAA, PCI, SOC 2): do you have current evidence, not just intent?",[364,492,493],{},"When was the last pen test and did the findings close?",[329,495,496,499],{},[367,497,498],{},"If score is below 3:"," threat model, audit trail, secrets rotation, and an identity-aware proxy are the fastest lifts.",[473,501,503],{"id":502},"_2-scalability","2. Scalability",[424,505,506,509,512,515],{},[364,507,508],{},"What is the current peak load, and what happens at 10x it?",[364,510,511],{},"Is work queue-based or synchronous?",[364,513,514],{},"Can you add compute without re-architecting?",[364,516,517],{},"Is the database a bottleneck you can name?",[329,519,520,522],{},[367,521,498],{}," queues and horizontal workers. Most \"we can't scale\" problems are \"we synchronously do everything in one process\" problems.",[473,524,526],{"id":525},"_3-maintainability","3. Maintainability",[424,528,529,532,535,538],{},[364,530,531],{},"How long until a new engineer can ship their first PR safely?",[364,533,534],{},"Do tests exist on critical paths?",[364,536,537],{},"Are architectural decisions documented somewhere other than someone's head?",[364,539,540],{},"Can you make a small change without reading the whole system?",[329,542,543,545],{},[367,544,498],{}," mandatory code review, tests on the five most business-critical paths, and ADRs (architecture decision records) for anything non-trivial.",[473,547,549],{"id":548},"_4-delivery-velocity","4. Delivery Velocity",[424,551,552,555,558,561],{},[364,553,554],{},"What is the time from commit to production?",[364,556,557],{},"How often does a release cause an incident?",[364,559,560],{},"Do you have CI\u002FCD or \"CI\u002FCD\" (manual button, scripts on someone's laptop)?",[364,562,563],{},"Feature flags, or direct-to-prod toggles?",[329,565,566,568],{},[367,567,498],{}," real CI\u002FCD, preview environments per PR, and feature flags so you can ship and roll back fast.",[473,570,572],{"id":571},"_5-observability","5. Observability",[329,574,575],{},"This is where most organizations score lowest. It is also where the lowest score hurts most, because without observability every other score is an educated guess.",[424,577,578,581,584,587],{},[364,579,580],{},"Do you have metrics, logs, and traces? All three?",[364,582,583],{},"Are SLOs defined and alerted on?",[364,585,586],{},"Can you answer \"what was the p95 latency of endpoint X yesterday\" in under five minutes?",[364,588,589],{},"Is there an on-call rotation with a real runbook?",[329,591,592,594],{},[367,593,498],{}," drop whatever is second priority and fix this first. We mean it.",[473,596,598],{"id":597},"_6-cost-efficiency","6. Cost Efficiency",[424,600,601,604,607,610],{},[364,602,603],{},"What is your cost per active user \u002F per transaction \u002F per customer?",[364,605,606],{},"Is the trajectory improving or worsening month over month?",[364,608,609],{},"Do you have cost alerts tied to anomalies?",[364,611,612],{},"What percentage of spend is on idle resources?",[329,614,615,617],{},[367,616,498],{}," tag everything, set a cost anomaly alert, right-size the top three spend lines. Don't start with \"let's migrate clouds.\" Start with \"let's stop paying for things nobody uses.\"",[473,619,621],{"id":620},"_7-tech-debt","7. Tech Debt",[424,623,624,627,630,633],{},[364,625,626],{},"Is there a written debt register, or just a shared sense that \"things are messy\"?",[364,628,629],{},"Do sprint plans reserve capacity for debt (15-20% is a healthy floor)?",[364,631,632],{},"Which debt is active (compounding, hurting velocity today) vs. dormant (not pretty, not hurting)?",[364,634,635],{},"Is anyone tracking the top 5 items?",[329,637,638,640],{},[367,639,498],{}," a one-page debt register and a standing 20% per sprint. You will not pay it all down. You will pay down the worst of it, which is what matters.",[473,642,644],{"id":643},"_8-team-fit","8. Team Fit",[424,646,647,650,653,656],{},[364,648,649],{},"Does your stack match your team's actual skills or your lead's preferences from five years ago?",[364,651,652],{},"Can you hire for this stack in your market?",[364,654,655],{},"Are engineers productive or fighting the stack?",[364,657,658],{},"Is any critical system owned by exactly one person?",[329,660,661,663],{},[367,662,498],{}," re-evaluate the stack choices honestly. \"We use Scala because our staff engineer loves it\" is not a team-fit argument when you are trying to hire three more engineers and the market has none.",[347,665,667],{"id":666},"the-gap-column-matters-more-than-the-score","The gap column matters more than the score",[329,669,670,671,674],{},"The score tells you where you are. The ",[367,672,673],{},"gap"," (target score minus current score) tells you what to do.",[329,676,677],{},"Pick your target score per dimension based on the business context, not the ideal. A three-person startup does not need Security at 5. A healthcare platform absolutely does. Set targets that match your risk tolerance and growth stage.",[329,679,680],{},"Then sort by gap size. Biggest gap is your top priority this quarter, not biggest-dimension or most-fashionable-topic. If your observability gap is +3 and your scalability gap is +1, observability wins, even if everyone on the team wants to talk about scalability.",[347,682,684],{"id":683},"the-weakest-link-rule","The weakest link rule",[329,686,687],{},"In any system of dimensions, the overall user experience is capped by the weakest one. A platform that scales to any load but has broken observability is a platform that will fail spectacularly and you will not know why for hours.",[329,689,690],{},"This is why the audit is worth doing as a radar chart rather than a bar chart. A bar chart encourages you to optimize the tallest bar because it looks rewarding. A radar chart forces you to look at the shape of the polygon, and an unbalanced polygon is an unstable platform.",[329,692,693,696],{},[367,694,695],{},"Balanced 3s across eight dimensions beat one 5 and three 1s."," Every single time.",[347,698,700],{"id":699},"how-to-run-the-audit","How to run the audit",[329,702,703],{},"Ninety minutes with three people is enough for a first pass.",[361,705,706,712,718,724,734],{},[364,707,708,711],{},[367,709,710],{},"Schedule 90 minutes"," with your tech lead, a senior engineer, and a product-side stakeholder.",[364,713,714,717],{},[367,715,716],{},"Score live."," Each person silently scores each dimension 0-5. Reveal together. Discuss gaps of 2+ points in the scoring. The conversation is where the value is.",[364,719,720,723],{},[367,721,722],{},"Set targets."," For each dimension, pick a target for 12 months out. Be realistic, not aspirational.",[364,725,726,729,730,733],{},[367,727,728],{},"Sort by gap."," Rank dimensions by ",[14,731,732],{},"target - current",", descending.",[364,735,736,739],{},[367,737,738],{},"Pick top three."," Assign an owner and a first move for each. Put them in your next quarter's plan.",[329,741,742],{},"That's it. No Confluence wiki required, though you'll want to write the scorecard down somewhere you can look at it in six months and see whether the numbers moved.",[347,744,746],{"id":745},"re-score-every-quarter","Re-score every quarter",[329,748,749],{},"A one-shot audit is useful. A quarterly re-score is transformative. Two reasons:",[424,751,752,758],{},[364,753,754,757],{},[367,755,756],{},"Scores drift."," Things you fixed can regress. Things you ignored can get worse. The dimensions you were not thinking about last quarter are often where problems appear.",[364,759,760,763],{},[367,761,762],{},"Targets should evolve."," As the business grows, what counts as \"good\" changes. A score of 3 on scalability was fine at 1000 users and is a crisis at 100,000.",[329,765,766],{},"Track the eight scores over time and the trend tells you more than any single snapshot. Flat scores = organization running in place. Rising scores = maturity. Falling scores = something important is breaking and nobody has named it yet.",[347,768,770],{"id":769},"what-we-do-with-it","What we do with it",[329,772,773],{},"When Innovi Pro runs this audit with a client, the first session is the scorecard. The second session is a 90-day plan against the top three gaps. The third session, 90 days later, is the re-score.",[329,775,776],{},"Most of our long engagements start this way. The audit is not the product. Without it, though, every recommendation is just opinion. With it, the roadmap argues for itself.",[329,778,779],{},"The scorecard is free. You don't need us to run it. You do need to be honest on the scoring, which is the hardest part, and the easiest to skip.",[329,781,782],{},"Run it next week. Find the weakest link. Fix that one thing. You will already know more about your architecture than most teams know about theirs, because most teams never run this exercise.",{"title":784,"searchDepth":785,"depth":785,"links":786},"",2,[787,788,789,800,801,802,803,804],{"id":349,"depth":785,"text":350},{"id":418,"depth":785,"text":419},{"id":467,"depth":785,"text":468,"children":790},[791,793,794,795,796,797,798,799],{"id":475,"depth":792,"text":476},3,{"id":502,"depth":792,"text":503},{"id":525,"depth":792,"text":526},{"id":548,"depth":792,"text":549},{"id":571,"depth":792,"text":572},{"id":597,"depth":792,"text":598},{"id":620,"depth":792,"text":621},{"id":643,"depth":792,"text":644},{"id":666,"depth":785,"text":667},{"id":683,"depth":785,"text":684},{"id":699,"depth":785,"text":700},{"id":745,"depth":785,"text":746},{"id":769,"depth":785,"text":770},"https:\u002F\u002Finnovi.pro\u002Fblog\u002Farchitecture-audit-eight-dimensions","2026-04-17","Score your architecture honestly across eight dimensions in under two hours. The weakest score is not a weakness. It is your roadmap. Here is the exact scorecard we use with clients.","md","Eight-dimension radar chart and scorecard panel for an architecture audit covering security, scalability, maintainability, delivery velocity, observability, cost efficiency, tech debt, and team fit, with current scores and target gaps.","\u002Fblog\u002Fdiagrams\u002Farchitecture-audit-dimensions.png",{},"\u002Fblog\u002Farchitecture-audit-eight-dimensions","8 min",{"title":320,"description":807},"blog\u002Farchitecture-audit-eight-dimensions",[817,818,819,820,821],"architecture","technical audit","engineering leadership","tech debt","observability","summary_large_image","article","jHbsaulWwTd_uepUDmyLPLhia3iNeRtwaJxQNBwrWCA",1791637290226]